Well, Christians are known for fishing, so this is not unreasonably cautious. Always beware an approach on the intertubez which starts with a leading question. Especially if the enquirer is covered in bling.
There's no need for that.
That's more respectful. Oh, no, it isn't.
Second child abuse reference; oh dear, I can see where this is going. What on earth could the dear Pope have done to merit such calumny?
This guy hits the nail on the head; until we see the Pope with his head down in the Popemobile (steady), feverishly thumbing away in 140 characters about the monkey shopper, I won't be satisfied that he's taking Twitter seriously.
Love can strike at any time. Good luck with those marriage arrangements, though.
I bet Benny doesn't even reply. Look at his tongue!
It turns out that 'Cupcakes' was the most popular answer to this question; who knew?
Faithless heathen!
DOH! Fourth reference.
Anyway, the bookies are laying odds on who the pope will have his first Twitter row with. Latest:
Evens Richard Dawkins
2-1 God
5-1 Archbishop of Canterbury
10-1 Rihanna
20-1 Piers Morgan
Follow the conversation on... https://twitter.com/search?q=pontifex&src=typd
Here's a graphic of the Pope's followers around the world (click to enlarge):
I think the internet could be the demise of the Church.
I'm hoping Frank!
But I think that may be too much to ask. We need to keep pushing them on their unreasonable doctrines and stop them unduly influencing affairs of state; that, I think, would be a reasonable compromise.
Tres drole.
Thanks for this. I am far happier about the whole business now.
Glad it cheered you up, S; he's up to 7 tweets and counting. All dull as ditchwater. No photos of his posse yet.